Submission Notes
* Authors must prepare their papers using our Microsoft Word template for submission.
1. The subject of the manuscript should be related to Environmental Engineering, Agricultural Pollution or Hydraulical Studies.
2. Paper size is European A4.
3. Make sure that your article is more than an abstract. It should be a full article.
4. The paper includes the author name and affiliation (full address including country).
5. There are no page numbers, or headers and footers, within the paper.
6. Text is single spaced, not double spaced.
7. The file is editable and not password protected.
8. All pages are portrait (landscape pages should be rotated).
9. Reference lists are checked for accuracy.
10. References can only be linked via Crossref if they are correct and complete.
11. Figures are placed within the text, not collected at the end of the document.
12. A thorough proofread is conducted to check the standard of English and ensure wording is clear and concise.
Please submit your paper via Email:
Submission deadline
April 10, 2021
Notification of acceptance / rejection
Within 7-10 working days after submission
Registration deadline
One week after Notification of Acceptance
Conference Days
May 29-30, 2021
SUBMISSION GUIDE
It will be of great help to the EEAPHS 2021 Organizer if referees could consider the following key points related to scientific content, quality and presentation:
1. Technical Criteria
- Scientific merit: notably scientific rigour, accuracy and correctness.
- Clarity of expression; communication of ideas; readability and discussion of concepts.
- Sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing.
2. Quality Criteria
- Originality: Is the work relevant and novel?
- Motivation: Does the problem considered have a sound motivation? All papers should clearly demonstrate the scientific interest of the results.
- Repetition: Have significant parts of the manuscript already been published?
- Length: Is the content of the work of sufficient scientific interest to justify its length?
3. Presentation Criteria
- Title: Is it adequate and appropriate for the content of the article?
- Abstract: Does it contain the essential information of the article? Is it complete? Is it suitable for inclusion by itself in an abstracting service?
- Diagrams, figures, tables and captions: Are they essential and clear?
- Text and mathematics: Are they brief but still clear? If you recommend shortening, please suggest what should be omitted.
- Conclusion: Does the paper contain a carefully written conclusion, summarizing what has been learned and why it is interesting and useful?
|
|